<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quaility and GeoWeb 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joesonic.com/blog/2008/03/13/quaility-and-geoweb-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joesonic.com/blog/2008/03/13/quaility-and-geoweb-20/</link>
	<description>The Web's new Math is Geography - joesonic is blogging</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben R.</title>
		<link>http://joesonic.com/blog/2008/03/13/quaility-and-geoweb-20/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joesonic.com/blog/2008/03/13/quaility-and-geoweb-20/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I've approached some of my supervisors/coworkers with the idea of exposing non-sensitive data to the crowd.  The primary objection is the liability aspect.  Disclaimers only do so much to mitigate this, the argument goes - if an agency or firm even attempts to maintain data used by the public they invariably take some responsibility for its accuracy.  They see it as a significant potential cost for a marginal gain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve approached some of my supervisors/coworkers with the idea of exposing non-sensitive data to the crowd.  The primary objection is the liability aspect.  Disclaimers only do so much to mitigate this, the argument goes - if an agency or firm even attempts to maintain data used by the public they invariably take some responsibility for its accuracy.  They see it as a significant potential cost for a marginal gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
