I know, I’m late about this news of Angelinas Geo-tattoo. The Geo-community has produced mash-ups of these locations and so millions of users of Google Maps and Google earth can view an these coordinates on street-level information or uising high resolution statellite imageries for these four places.

(Source: “Angelina Jolie is a Geowanker” at O’Reilly Radar)
Example mashup of the coordinates:

A well-known definition of Geographic Information Systems (GIS)devide GIS in four major component - hardware, software, data and people. The wikification of GIS has clearly been manifested in all these four aspects (Sui 2008). This is one aspect where web 2.0 has influence in GI Science. Also the borders across geographic, social, economic, cultural, and demographic information are blurring. It is not so unusal that J. Dangermond commented in 2007 that the information available over the entire World Wide Web could be georeferenced or geo-tagged in the near future, and that filly georeferenced or geo-tagged world is approaching us far mich faster than anybody ever predicted.
The accelerating wikification of GIS has also promoted the emergence of what Turner (2006) calls NeoGeography. As demonstrated by the Angelina Jolie story, the NeoGeography is practiced by the masses using the last Web 2.0 technologies.
[The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie's new tattoo and the future of this, Daniel Z. Sui, 2008, Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, United States]
Written and submitted from Home, using my 802.11g WiFi network.
Recent Comments